Below is the citation and summary points of a new paper in the open-access journal PLoS Medicine. I would be interested to hear from anyone working with the four major training programmes described (MEPI, NEPI, HRH Program, and GHSP).
CITATION: Maximizing the Impact of Training Initiatives for Health Professionals in Low-Income Countries: Frameworks, Challenges, and Best Practices
by Corrado Cancedda, Paul E. Farmer, Vanessa Kerry et al.
PLoS Med 12(6): e1001840 (16 June 2015)
– Historically, the impact of many health professional training initiatives in low-income countries has been limited by narrow focus on a small set of diseases, inefficient utilization of donor funding, inadequate scale up, insufficient emphasis on the acquisition of practical skills, poor alignment with local priorities, and lack of coordination.
– Fortunately, several innovative training initiatives have emerged over the past five years in sub-Saharan Africa. This article focuses on four initiatives funded by the United States government: the Medical Education Training Partnership Initiative (MEPI), the Nursing Training Partnership Initiative (NEPI), the Rwanda Human Resources for Health Program (HRH Program), and the Global Health Service Partnership (GHSP).
– The best practices adopted by these initiatives are: alignment to local priorities, country ownership, competency-based training, institutional capacity building, and the establishment of long-lasting partnerships with international stakeholders,
– Based on these best practices, we outline a framework for health professional training initiatives that can help better address the health workforce shortage in low-income countries.
Let’s build a future where people are no longer dying for lack of healthcare knowledge – Join HIFA: www.hifa2015.org